Blue Prints Of Bunny Hutches

"New Fathers" and the old roles

It is absolutely commendable that many fathers have now reached a point where they recognize that a vibrant and caring relationship with their children not only chore has to be, but also enrich their own and the life the children may present. It is likely that a large part of those men who are ready and willing to play a role in the lives of their children, this effectively . Create

exhausted his father is not alone in the Sunday stroller or push in the abandonment of work beer and sports show in favor of playing with the children or the bedtime story. His father also means being the sex role-giving role to the child, that is the prototype of the first, exemplary man justice. Depending on how a father is present and is as much with themselves as husband and father at peace, the shape will influence the behavior of his son or daughter in dealing with your own or the opposite sex in one way or the other and. In the quality of his intercourse with the children in their basic relationship to be decided themselves and to other people. The more it is welcome that more and more fathers are fathers like and maintain close contact with their children to accompany their development as a loving and trustworthy person for children are available. It also shows the children that is also: How can men be!

If the marriage or relationship and it seems the family is largely intact, the desire to play a role as a father in the lives of children, to realize not that hard. In case of separation or divorce of the couple, however, it looks different.

do men have a say here now a word, and of course, and rightly so. They are the obvious in question, the principle is still assumed that children remain with their mother after separation. They call for the participation in the rights of, and rightly demanding that it not be left to the mercy of the mothers stay, whether they be near their children than fathers may or may not.

fathers complain that even though a state from which they benefited themselves to a great extent and still profit. The flat rate "The child belongs to the mother," she has in the past acquitted of all sorts of obligations and the mothers - single mothers or not - be significant. They were the mothers of the children not a negligible had part of her private life, his wishes and not least to sacrifice their career prospects. The headline "Single father loses his job because he finds no childcare place for his daughter" was a club fathers express mention. It saw only the father, which is for single mothers in fact a common practice: Slower Job opportunities with a child, poor care facilities, exclusion is left alone with the entire management about survival in everyday life, the child and their needs. To ask

would be, whether the fathers would be willing also to pay the obligations and burdens, if a judge says: "The child belongs to the Father!"

From the standpoint of a full-time job from his father who wants to see his child on the weekends, can complain very easily. A room for Junior can set up easier than a whole new life. were According to the Federal Statistical Office in 2007, only 1% of the 29 million German men, single fathers. These statistics cover unfortunately not its reasons. Would or could not be?

It brings to mind inevitably to the question of how well the relationship and have associated the task of dividing the couple's parents looked like before the separation. 66% of German men managed according to the Federal Statistical Office in 2007, no Children in the household. Only 25% of men waver in a marriage or cohabitation as a single parent at least one child under 18 large. So where are the men who were so happy fathers did during the marriage and relationship?

course, it is difficult to convey to a mother, a father who has during the marriage or relationship only sporadic care in the evening to his child, suddenly demands a divorce after a completely different approach. The presence of the father is very important for a child, but that's even before they divorce.

was in the traditional roles of this absence of the father in family well very noticeable. I myself am a child of the seventies, and was out of the very revolutionary group even at that time still the default, that Dad went to work while Mom was at home. This way, I saw my father as absent in the first place. But he was present, it is usually for the purpose of judging and punishing. I think under these circumstances, many of us grew up. All the more commendable it is that the men rush to give the relationship with their children a different quality and are present in the first place is lovely to do. However: The old cemented the role values are to be the more likely the mother is still the most trusted person of the child . Remain As is the case exclusively, any man can have from birth of his child a say in how it is represented in the structure of the family. have

men who care for itself in its intense relationship to the children and maintained a close and loving contact with them, it is also easier to teach the mothers the seriousness of their intentions with respect to the children. Of course, each of the other goes in reverse but even more to the barricades, the sooner he suspects the intentions of the other person could not possibly be based so much on the child, but rather seek to violate the ex-partner.

, The interest of both parents in fact the child's interests, as is claimed so often, then would the parents know that it is important to muster the energy for a real dialogue, ending probably in a compromise (ie, swabs and concessions from both sides calls), instead of using them on herumzuzerren the child. who

The responsibility for the escalation of the mothers custody dispute is, of course not be underestimated as well.

because of biological factors, the mother of the beginning of a closer bond with the child than the father. She held it was born, nurtured, and the child sees himself not yet separated the beginning of his life from the mother, she takes it even after birth as a true part of himself. resolve this symbiosis and the child more and more to let go is a task that the mother has to cope alone, and there is nothing comparable to afford a father would, even if he finds, of course, later in situations in which releasing emergency does.

One mother, in marriage or relationship - as is the traditional role of the case idea - has always been the primary caregiver for the child is to do with letting go even harder. In a divorce situation is required from the mother to relinquish control over the child. It is to the child suddenly to trust the Father, without even be there to.

Some mothers are in their emotional life by the divorce situation is so overwhelmed that they want to keep at least over the child and the relationship with him in control. They grasp at any cost to the child and in this situation not ready to make concessions to the father. A fundamental uncertainty at the ex-partner who may have hurt her feelings or she brings cheated, they may only read more, at least as the child relates everything to do exactly handle on as before. Customary sense of security. that also suffer under this attitude and has a child by the unusual narrowness of the new parent can be overwhelmed, is beyond question. That is why it is so important that both former partner their own feelings with regard to the separation of look as closely as possible. Only then there is the chance that the relationship problem is not moved to the child and find out the situation through awareness is a solution.

much easier and both parties would be if would not begin in the separation situation with the persuasion that the father is really a good father. If that experience could be made already in the relationship of both the mother and the children, then the circumstances are clearer, and also a mixture of the emotional world is less likely. This includes, however, that a father from the beginning its responsibilities fully and he was not only in a divorce situation think that he has children to whom he would take care of. Women have conquered with great success in the past 30 to 40 years the world of work for themselves, have demanded the privileges of men for themselves, and can now take at least to a certain extent can claim to have reached these points equal rights. Contrast, is so far the women attributed to emotional and caring field by the men voluntarily without plowing yet remained remarkably, whether from fear, as a "wimp" insult become, from career pressure, from the unwillingness to give up certain freedoms or lack of interest. Men can change that fact by their own behavior, and the women they must leave, even more, they must encourage them and realize that therein lies a relief opportunity.

What Is Going Rate For Tile Installation In Ca

background information about the False Memory Syndrome (FMS)

The theory of "False Memory Syndrome" is ominously similar to us in increasingly popular in Germany. It will weaken inter alia, divorce and separation disputes the allegations of sexual abuse, which are used in connection with handling and custody arrangements as a weapon. The victim is, however, not the respective opponents in the divorce war, but in particular the actual victims of sexual abuse , whether adult or still children.

The term "False Memory Syndrome" is based on the theory that allegations of survivors of sexual abuse are based on so-called "false memories" that the person had been persuaded by psychotherapists allegedly suggestive.

the term was coined by American mathematician Peter Freyd and his wife Pamela. The pair faced the accusation of his daughter exposed to Jennifer, the father had sexually abused as a child (other family members Jennifer substantiated allegation). As a result, Freyd founded in 1992, "False Memory Syndrome Foundation. So they offered parents accused of sexual abuse of a platform. The Freyd noted a spread of "False Memory Syndrome" of epidemic proportions, and wrote of the blame, especially the therapies, in which the victims were straight. In particular, late recurrent memories are highly questionable, and it was very easy to create a false memory, even if such an event never happened. People who are remembered for a long time until once again be highly influenced. So much for the theory of Freyd.

Especially the term "syndrome" gives in this context seems that it was the "False Memory Syndrome" is a diagnosable disease or at least a collection of symptoms, but neither the "False Memory Syndrome Foundation nor anyone else made himself so far the effort, precise criteria for determining this "syndrome" defined. A scientific substantiation of claims Freydschen is yet to be.

this country rely on the internet mainly representatives of the thesis on the work of American psychology professor Elizabeth Loftus, who has shown in some studies, the extent to which memories actually can manipulate (for example, succeeded in the Loftus known "lost in the mall" experiment to make six of 24 subjects believe they are in their infancy actually once got lost in a shopping center, although this is not the case). is ignored all too often, however, that Loftus' study results are not suited to a derivation of generalized theories about the veracity of memories of sexual abuse. The very fact that Loftus' studies carried out under laboratory conditions and for ethical reasons, not even close to the quality of a real traumatic experience of abuse should have, they disqualified as valid proof of the existence of the "False Memory Syndrome."

The "False Memory Syndrome Foundation" itself refers also to substantiate the "syndrome" above all to the reports of affected parents who came forward in the foundation is there and turned for help after against one or both of the charges of sexual abuse was appropriate. The scientific character of such statements must of course be questioned and rightly so. In addition, it makes the parents involved do not necessarily credible, that the Foundation was no effort to verify their actual guilt or innocence.

There is evidence that sexual abuse victims forget have a significant memories of the incident itself and related events or drive. This is not necessarily the case, but memory loss, amnesia and dissociation are associated with sexual abuse generally well documented. Memories of sexual violence often come only after years or decades to light.

This emerging after long-term memories but are now massively by the advocates of the "False Memory Syndrome" in doubt. The claim is made in the room that returned memories not of the same truth and value were as constant Memories. The "False Memory Syndrome Foundation, however, leads to no evidence of" poor quality "of such memories returned, and it's never been proven in independent studies, that such memories are more or less valid than others. Also, there are

no evidence that recovered memories are based on the suggestions of therapists - patients regained both within treatments and completely independent of their memories.

complexes, such as traumatic memories of sexual abuse can not simply be implanted into a patient's brain. It is much more likely that will be addressed by authoritarian pressure within families (including adult children) the memory of such a serious injury. Not suffer without reason abused children, among other reasons so much because they trust their own perceptions can not. What must not, can not be in the family. Even if the memories were constantly present, often takes a long time until a / e survivor / r dares to comment about it. Too large are still the family and social repression.

The "False Memory Syndrome" is a construct for the relief of abuse accused people, whether they are actually guilty of it or not. For this purpose it was designed, and so is also explained that in the vicinity of the "False Memory Syndrome Foundation" increasingly becoming a predator to get there in principle a charter issued to acting out their sexual needs. The "False Memory Syndrome" is not a recognized illness, no scientifically proven phenomenon, are there any diagnostic category.

It may well be true that many a charge not in reference to sexual abuse is stable and the alleged perpetrator has done really nothing. Unjustified accusations it is in all areas of crime, to prevent so in this, and false convictions is for the judiciary.

The weighting arises, however, for the representatives of "false memory" theory a little different: expressed

Ralph Under Wager, a founding member of the "False Memory Syndrome Foundation, in 1985 in an interview:
" (It is) more . more desirable that a thousand children in abuse situations are not discovered than for one innocent person to be convicted wrongly "(" It is desirable that thousands of children go undetected in abuse situations than that one innocent person is wrongly convicted " - quotes by Dallam, source details below).

same Ralph Under Wager also gave pedophile magazine Paidika: The Journal of pedophilia. "Later became a highly controversial interview

simulates the large presence of" False Memory Syndrome Foundation in the U.S. media that the phenomenon of "False Memory Syndrome" is in fact and that there is clinically relevant. The construct is used but only in undermining the credibility of victims and the protection of the perpetrators. The public is deceptive also has the character of psychotherapists, as its sole purpose is presented, their patients traumatic experiences persuade to do. The Foundation is pretending to be also significantly have more members than is actually the case. So that it inflates the explosive nature of the "false memories" phenomenon at enormous and gives such a false picture.

Critical to this development is the increasing popularity of "False Memory" theory. Criticism in this country over what had originally constructed a deal with an abuse allegation fronted parents as a relief strategy.

The victims must drive to despair. Dealing with a modest occupied, painful subject as his own sexual abuse is difficult enough, especially when it took place in the family. It is a taboo to speak, the reality is denied, the inwardly crumbling family system should be maintained at all costs. Then appears an idea that quickly even the medical-sounding label "syndrome" glued and an excellent method is to place the victim in his whole being, including all of his feelings, perceptions and experiences in question. Inhuman, it does not get any.

(Source: Dallam, SJ, "? Crisis or Creation A Systematic Examination of" False Memory Syndrome "," http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/6.html, accessed on 07.06. 2010th
Dallam text refers to the Annex, a detailed bibliography.)

What To Look For In A River Boat

The abuse accusations as a weapon

parents who are in an ongoing separation or divorce have, it is not easy. Come to a point where we admit the failure of a marriage or relationship has to like to cook up the emotions - especially when it comes to "who gets what." That may well still, if it is the remaining, not yet shattered porcelain or the flat screen TV. With the children it looks a little different.

appears in the battle for the children so many parents are separating couples hardly a means to be too good to each other's education as unfit or harmful for the child present. Not to speak of that this is not really in focus, with whom the children have it good where they feel comfortable and what is good for their mental and physical well-being and development. Children are all too often the subject of dispute , and that's bitter. Mothers and fathers who differ, it seems rather in the main, to have the right to go. The well-fed hatred of the other, it can simply not allow the child to the all-important deal. Their own feelings of disgust and disappointment are projected onto the child, instead of having to engage constructively deals with them.

So it is for many a mother close by means of a serious to get rid of the alleged father: the child sexual abuse of .
Even if there is no evidence to refute this charge is difficult, if only once in the room. Of course, it must first be about protecting a child from sexual assault by whom whatsoever, and it is very important to follow reasonable instructions. But the effect of such an assertion is by beating and thus also the perfect way to keep fathers from their children.

In this connection, often by the "abuse of the abuse" is mentioned. No matter how valid the evidence of actual child sexual abuse after all - the conjecture is expressed and can not be withdrawn without further notice. That is, regardless of actual guilt or innocence in any case detrimental to the father. The accusation of sexual abuse is thus suitable for exercise of revenge for suffered emotional injuries that are open in a divorce or separation situation. I have no doubt that there are mothers who make use of this remedy, even where there is really no abuse.

But it is certainly not that the fathers in this fight would now back down. First, they lead the argument that the abuse Abuse will operate to strengthen plenty to battle to their own position. It is again not important, not whether they have actually been accused of sexual abuse of children by their parents or. It's much more about their mothers' abuse with abuse " generalized reproach, to make them credible, and that prophylactic . Whenever then an appropriate charge is expressed, the involved fathers can withdraw it that this happens only to neutralize them and keep them out of their children. In this way, a picture drawn by the mothers to them any real interest in the child welfare denied from the outset. In particular, members of relevant associations tend fathers in the recent past to women in general in this regard as weak and selfish character display.


On the other hand is now also in fashion that fathers representatives back the wife or mother as a perpetrator of abuse, particularly in the focus. The perpetrator of women is thus used as a counterweight to qualify the picture of the abusive father or stepfather. Undeniably, women in relation to child sexual abuse and perpetrators - a fact that was a long time under the table, as well as the abuse of male children and adolescents. However, in the context with custody and access rights discussions the offense by the women to an extent over-emphasized the need to make skeptical and allows for critical minds only one conclusion: Here it is again about exploitation.

Quite often even the so-called "False Memory Syndrome" used to discharge the accused, the memories of victims of a systematic abuse seeks to undermine.

In all these discussions about sexual abuse almost inevitably falls into the eye, how little it goes to the alleged victim, the child. There are clear, verifiable evidence of sexual abuse in fact taken place, to think of a child can not. The nature of psychological trauma - and sexual abuse is a serious injury - has now been sufficiently researched and documented. Of which are very different the stories told by many a child mum or dad for the sake of the "bad" parent. Such stories can be checked out pretty well for logical flaws.

The use of the alleged abuse of power, in the struggle for a child is particularly why so insidious and reprehensible because it causes so many places at the same irreparable harm.

First, is the damage to the child even clear if not actually a sexual abuse has happened. For my opinion it is clearly in the category of psychological abuse to stop a child to tell in for it already critical situation of separation or divorce situation, the bad untruth about a basically beloved parent, and this story remain under great pressure from in-depth interviews faithful.

If it comes as a result, moreover, that the rights of the accused parent is removed, it is obvious that a child extra in his fantasies of omnipotence may therefore develop even guilt is. "The paper may / the mom not to come to you because he / she has done bad things to you!" It will also call into question his perception when it is told, although this fact was not the case at all. Similarly, moreover, even if the other party falls into similar patterns of behavior and in turn ascends the big guns to secure the sympathy of the child for his person at all costs.

The internal chaos of a child so shamelessly used is difficult to imagine.

The damage to the actual victims of sexual violence within the family is also huge, because its credibility in the whole debate is suffering enormously. For victims, it is difficult to talk at all. Alone and the courage to turn to someone for help requires immense strength. If in the social perception of flat and reckless statements about "abuse of the abuse" Now the idea is cemented, any abuse reports were in any case only weapons in divorce and separation wars, then lose the testimony of the actual victims of weight.

Moderate voices are weaker, until finally no one listens.

The instrumentalization of the abuse allegations and the entire issue is in my abuse Eyes a disgrace. Given the plight of the victims and the still (currently including the Federal notes) very high number of abused girls and boys should prohibit, without exception, from the outset, the theme trifle and thoughtless and use it to enforce its own interests.

injured people are unfortunately very inventive when it comes to harming others. There is a little afraid to take up too deep in the box of dirty tricks to compensate for their own wounded, the grief and pain. Had the parties involved in this ugly spectacle only a couple, that would be bad in itself enough, but between the front sits the child without an advocate and without someone who stands up for his health.

The injuries suffered by it in this event, are a very high price for the absolute right possessiveness of two feuding people.

concept clarification:
I use at this point in the context of both sexual and psychological violence, the term "abuse", and only thus, is because in general usage, unfortunately enforced no better name for the facts. The term "abuse" implies that bodies and souls of children as intended and GE needs might be, which is not the case. I consider all forms of abuse, however, always as an abuse of power on the part of the practitioner of violence against his fellow man. Terms like "child molester" I would consciously avoid, for abuse should not be regarded as the shame of the child, but the shame of the perpetrator . Unfortunately, this form of sexual violence in society is far from enough and is ostracized at best superficially in the sensational press attention. For clean, differentiating concepts and considerations, unfortunately, there is little space.

Beer And Gall Bladder

torn children

A child can not choose, circumstances in which it is born. Some parents are already beginning was not really together. But many still choose the standard version of the path to child: love, engaged, married. The child finally is the final crowning of the family fortune. It is planned, so it works well in many cases. Then parents are people like everyone else: they are fallible, stressed, annoyed, but also loving and responsible, mindful and present. They do for their children what they can.

But what happens if it is different? If the idyll, than the one experienced the partnership and marriage in its early stages yet, despite all intentions in anger, abuse, Profanity, violence, fraud or even dissolve?


The two that had done so tight, "forever" stay together, are suddenly two deeply wounded people. You have to deal with broken dreams and wounded souls. After a partnership disappointment today simply turn off its back and to disperse sounds so easy, but probably the least successful. First, the wounds are open, and there are people who develop a great talent for it also to keep open. The separation from bed and board, the separation of the apartment, even a divorce can entangled in one another, another injured partner to bring not really deal. Suddenly messages fly back and forth, brought by third parties. It is threatened and insulted, vilified and blamed. Rumors are spread. The common sense of the other is being questioned, made his interpersonal skills in dispute. That in itself is a condition that is difficult and exhausting. It can convert between two people sometimes degenerate into a real war.

too big, too serious sometimes the humiliation suffered, as could the former partners or spouses apart walk upright. Most unfortunately, is also located in such a situation also still quite existing remote possibility, help to take advantage.

, imagine between all the front of a child. It is existentially dependent the reliability of his parents on their good presence on the constancy and predictability of their speeches and actions. It is completely dependent of the people who have given him life, and the feel it, even if it can not name it - small as it is.

The child is between these fronts, in the midst of the escalation of emotions. Not only does it overlook the situation in general can not because the fighting above his eye level. Not merely that the most important people in his life, suddenly degrade each other, yell at or anschweigen and thus make its hold in the life in question . Not only has it experienced a tension that it must relate to because he no one says that it bears no blame for all this. All this is in itself is a great weight there.

it actually comes to separation or divorce, many parents go one step further. The child, already inevitably overwhelmed by the new, unpredictable situation between the parents, is now the subject.

The little person who is so helpless in the middle of the action, is used.

begins when the ostensibly innocent-looking "Tell your father to ...", the result of the refusal to communicate with parents, to the tangible custody battle. In between is a whole range of hair-raising practices of the parents: The child is made a substitute partner or to the suggestion box, the errand boy, an instrument of hatred, for leverage. If there is to fight for custody or access rights, then the original marriage dispute is sometimes shifted to the back of the child. Then it's suddenly important to represent the feuding partners, who is the better parent to face in this area as their own moral superiority the other to demonstrate. It is being fought, whom the child "is one" who has a right to it and under what conditions. The child is being manipulated for the purpose to make a statement, who loves it more. Depending on which parent in this game, the more skillful hands, the child the other parent, finally more or less alienated and has to cope with it apart from all others, even the loss of a model.

The concept of child well-being experiences, unfortunately, still in this context hardly a tribute. The involvement of the two warring parents is too great for the view that could be directed at what the child to his Well-served. First, the parties are in dispute rather more about who the child is doing well. This is of course in the eyes of most of his own person, not the opposite.

falls under the table with all the wrangling, the fact that a child needs both parents . It may be that the divided up bile but also and especially in cases of separation and the resulting stress situation for the child they are asked as parents. were From the moment of conception, these two persons parents of this child, and they will remain on their own death. This state of parenthood is irreversible, and it is inseparable with responsibilities. Regardless of who is on which more failures in marriage and who is less culpable, is the child of a loving, assigned him facing parents. This fact is in divorce and custody battles unfortunately far too little taken into account. It is still too much for tenure and for justice have. have to suffer the consequences of grave conflicts, the children - has been shown to enter into adulthood.

The behavior of the parents in such cases of conflict characterizes the men's and women's image of children as well as the assessment of their intrinsic value as a person, their behavior later in their own relationships in adulthood and general view of interpersonal interaction. Seen in this light, the responsibility of the parents will probably barely rated high enough.

A child can not choose the circumstances in which it is born. It has no chance to withdraw from stressful situations. It can not change its dependence on the parents do not come out , and it is not able to select aware of what harms him and what not. It is the responsibility of parents to raise sufficient attention to the personality of their children and for their sake reliable in their capacity as parents, love and to remain respectful, in spite of all differences the couple's relationship. Here no one is perfect. Responsibility can mean in this case also, take help from the outside to overcome their differences to complete. A divorce may sometimes be unavoidable, but it is in the hands of the adult participants, whether the consequences become a trauma for the child or not.

Teacher Whitening Teeth

film criticism "disenfranchised father

film by Douglas Wolfsperger; interview with the SWR1-Radio 10/06/2009

Since this film in advance is quite controversial, I was also invited to an interview with the SWR1, to my view as there is now the adult child of divorce growing up fatherless, to describe, I have decided to summarily to report on my website about it. In addition to a film criticism, there is still my personal opinion about the film and (listen to mp3 file) down to a podcast of the SWR1 interviews on "fathers after separation."

"The disenfranchised father
film criticism of the Berliner Morgenpost 10:06:09:



"DISPOSED OF FATHER
Männerlarmoyanz that hard to bear is
Thursday 11 June 2009 04:00 - By B. Schweizerhof

A film to illustrate the new, anti-woman divorce seems.
Divorced women are angry, vengeful and egomaniac, because they take the poor fathers, right to child. But these men weeping women have done before they were so concealed. What other women to suffer from her ex-men, without dragging the children in the conflict, either.

It is literally mined area, the Douglas Wolfsperger enters with this documentation. As with almost any other topic the emotions boil immediately high when fathers complain that them is rendered impossible by the divorce of dealing with their own children by vindictive ex-wives, often with the support of youth courts and offices.

Wolfsperger has been through and the dispute over visiting rights with his daughter, he has met with other fathers with similar fate. Some of that he had brought for this film before the camera. It is striking how Wolfsperger emphasizing the masculinity of his protagonists in particular:
The policeman tells of his profession, the teacher is shown in the logging, the high earners in glider flying. Almost one has the impression that no one thinks, these men here about their feelings Talking it were sissies.

The personal concern Wolfsperger has therefore the starting point and method of his movie made and how not to expect, "the disenfranchised father" why a deliberately one-sided plea has become a kind of angry and yet sentimental outcry against the injustice of the practice of divorce law. The tales of woe, which reveal the fathers here are outrageous, in fact, and let the audience shake their heads about the extent of female treachery that runs against this father-child happiness to the field. be placed at the end of the film, in which grown men cry in front of the camera, one is almost ready, the beginning of a difficult to support humiliated father pronounced appeal, "the women to shoot for the moon." By then, however, you realize that sadness is not necessarily the best starting point for learning more about a topic. This "more" but could only be from the "other side" come, come here at any point to speak - to the cases of shattered. The woman occur, the Wolfsperger can he used as a clever lawyer as a witness of their own cause when he drives in the statement to see the father of her child only as a producer. The proverbial bull in a china shop remains: What is the relationship to happen to women that they end?

link to the article



My personal opinion about the father Wolfsperger and film:

Since me this topic Personally, I've now made my thoughts as a vulnerable child of divorce and because it is so here is a personally motivated film with its own perspective, allow me to express my personal opinion on this. After the SWR1 interview today I have come to the preliminary results (before the film's release): was raised

As in the film criticism already missing me in his film is a very important factor: an objective approach, where it is but be a documentary.

his story I have read up on his website (which unfortunately was removed in the meantime!) And I had the uncomfortable feeling that he wished to play down his personal outbursts and incontinence more likely. More it awakens in me the unpleasant impression that his main purpose was to do the ride until his "father right" file. This behavior is very human and you should then also stand by and do not gloss over anything. He is not authentic. Likewise, his film. Very little he wrote on his side as on his daughter, and I've missed completely, as he sees his daughter in all these disputes and how they must feel. That judge then take this father aside first surprised me, because of the incidents honestly do not. To put it in other words, as we know it needs always 2 parties to a marital dispute and if parents learn here not to finally differentiate that personal matters should not have to do the child you are, then the affected child suffers so the most.

The information that I could gather, I lack the important primary Misbehavior by him that there is not the one-sided condemnation of the other parent can really make something for the sake of his child and be so burdened child even more. It shows support for his film only a mother that fitted into his concept to his personal, subjective experience can be. Why it borders the other side in this movie? My guess: He says yes, it would be a "document for his daughter." In addition, he says: "Actually I do not know what a documentary is" (SWR1 Radio Interview of 10:06:09). I wonder now legitimately already, why he wants to "sell" this film now under the guise documentary, although the film from the outset this claim could never be fair? It probably has a lot to do with the public light lichen funding that made him get his former "comrade" and "Icon of the men's rights activists." Mind you, everyone, including single mothers, have co-funded propaganda anmutendend this "feature" as eligible "documentary".

But it is in all this is not really any question of guilt or self-knowledge of Mr. Wolfsperger. Rather, I always thought it's all about the child or children themselves, which still stands in all disputes arising out of focus, or not? Unfortunately, just leave this important aspect in its history, almost entirely ignored, I regret very much, because so only the one-sided perspective of a marginalized father is discussed. Strangely, he has changed his Homepage content between time and pulled out his own description. Probably because of the increasing criticism for the film before and I continue to wonder why he now can no longer stand to his own statements and turns with every interview like a flag in the wind? I have this procedure (only here as a new edition in the movie) is already in some fathers and mothers forums can watch for years (that is that typical gender war), and as we all know, has not really changed anything positive ever since.

This film is indeed the issue move back a bit more into the public what it means to be a concerned father, but not anymore. The important opportunity was missed to let everyone have their say (just affected fathers, but also the mothers and children). A comprehensive documentation would lead to much more that a rational discussion is set to the real benefit of the children in this country in transition where all parties can find themselves. This would then provide the important basic requirement, being able to meet each other again instead of continuing to put up the long worn-out model of "grave wars" that break the children of divorce even more is. This movie breaks my opinion, unfortunately, it is these trenches again, instead of building the necessary bridges long ago ...

EMUC





SWR1 radio interviews on the film's release "disenfranchised father:

Podcast DERABEND SWR1 10.06. Fathers after separation
Wednesday 10 June 2009 22:00
morning runs on the documentary, the father disposed of in theaters. Director Douglas Wolfsperger is a social Phenomenon to that found in the public eye, because there will men who are disposed of after a separation from their wives not only as partners but also as a father and the - often unsuccessfully - to fight for the relationship with their children. Four fathers describe their suffering and interviews in contact with their efforts. A mother justifies the refusal to deal from their perspective. Are these just isolated cases or are the fathers in fact often the losers when it comes to the children after a separation? We discuss, among other things: *

Wolfsperger Douglas (Director of the disenfranchised father) * Rainer
Sonneberg (of Fathers' Initiative for Children)
* Jürgen Rudolph, family court judge in Cochem and co-founder of
Cochemer practice
* EMUC (shelter ESK website)
Here the podcast (mp3 file download) are available at:

SWR1 The evening - fathers after separation (podcast has unfortunately removed from the SWR1 meantime!)