It is pushing that people who IV, social assistance or other Works of abuse. The bandied in the press are sobering examples, both in terms of the apparent extent of this practice and the shamelessness of the procedures.
same time, the abuse is inevitable and must to some degree acceptable.
It is logically the first question of the actual extent of the abuses. As long as the extent is not known or is considered high, put the abuse is a fundamental problem that threatens the existence of social welfare.
To the point of the IV-financing does all this but for now only a little. This is already a long-languishing scandal, because all the precarious position of IV and know AVS and no one dares to do something. Even though this Saturday the IV template is adopted, the situation remains the IV dramatic enough to make further reforms essential. The recovered through this additional funding period must therefore be used. In a no holes would be filled by any (net) debt and financed by future tax increases. Whether the pressure for reform would turn out this later can be questioned.
It is also for the media to inform there, especially because the patent policy failures and no one else can influence the agenda. Sorry, there are funding issues little public appeal (possibly even less in electronic Media and certainly not in a free media). I do still not believe that a democratic system is incapable of any reform, when it comes to questions of redistribution.
0 comments:
Post a Comment