Switzerland it lacked "finesse" was meant. The cases showed the Polanski and Kadhafi, one could not putt so important people simply.
How deep fall we have to, until we finally get to their senses? In Kadhafi Switzerland showed actually very awkward, because he had a diplomatic passport (even if the was not much really, but somehow he had ...). The sense of diplomatic passports is to prevent international crises (!). In violation of the "hospitality" to the courteous support also asked. About morality or immorality, one can argue, but official delegates of other states are not exactly equal before the law.
When Hollywood stars but there is no such grounds to discuss their crimes simply to condone. The less the rule of law can be circumvented, the better and even and especially famous people, because there is the credibility of the legal system is at stake. Despite some shortcomings, I have more confidence in the judiciary (in the U.S.) than in the vigilantism of media or cultural workers. Vigilante justice, it is in fact what is being attempted, only it's not about to hang the suspect immediately, but simply to run. In both cases, the legal system is about the same way bad! And if one or two French ministers see it that way, I am reassured in my opinion, because the separation of powers, which I love there, is also made in other cases, not very formal.
